ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
A persona-based exploration of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis seeking behavior and its implication for communication strategic planning: Evidence from Thailand.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Two-leaves and many bites: Profiling dog-bites and adherence to rabies prophylaxis in tea-estate communities of Udalguri District, Assam, India.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rabies is a lethal zoonotic illness that claims over 59,000 lives annually. However, this fatality can be avoided by postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). This study aimed to identify and characterize different personas of individuals regarding their PEP-seeking behavior and develop tailored communication strategies to encourage PEP adoption among these distinct groups effectively. We categorized our subjects, residing in two districts of Chonburi province, Thailand, into three groups: (i) individuals with a history of dog bites who underwent PEP; (ii) individuals bitten by dogs who did not receive PEP; and (iii) individuals who had never been bitten. Subsequently, we employed an empathy map, a visual method, and a customer journey map to better understand the participants' experiences and perceptions. A total of 38 individuals were interviewed. We categorized the participants into three distinct personas: positive, neutral, and negative trends. Individuals classified within the positive trend strongly advocate for seeking rabies vaccines in the event of a dog bite. Meanwhile, individuals who have a neutral inclination are more likely to contemplate getting vaccinated following a dog bite, particularly if the injury is substantial. Those with a negative trend demonstrate a notable lack of attention or concern toward preventing rabies. A lack of attention to the potential severity of the issue characterizes their attitude. Notably, nearly half (44.74 %; 17/38) of the individuals involved in the study indicated utilizing interpersonal communication, followed by digital platforms (42.11 %; 16/38) and traditional communication channels (10.52 %; 5/38). Tailoring communication modalities to suit each specific group is crucial for effective outreach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.