Evidence mapPaperPMID 39931353Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

A persona-based exploration of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis seeking behavior and its implication for communication strategic planning: Evidence from Thailand.

Jitjayang Yamabhai, Patoo Cusripituck, Teerawan Mingbualuang, Nareerat Sangkachai, Wimwiga Sakchainanon, Chanatda Tungwongjulaniam, Onphirul Yurachai, Ratana Theerawat, Anuwat Wiratsudakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jitjayang YamabhaiResearch Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Patoo CusripituckResearch Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Teerawan MingbualuangResearch Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Nareerat SangkachaiThe Monitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Wimwiga SakchainanonDivision of Communicable Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Chanatda TungwongjulaniamDivision of Communicable Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Onphirul YurachaiDivision of Communicable Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Ratana TheerawatDivision of Communicable Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Anuwat WiratsudakulThe Monitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies is a lethal zoonotic illness that claims over 59,000 lives annually. However, this fatality can be avoided by postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). This study aimed to identify and characterize different personas of individuals regarding their PEP-seeking behavior and develop tailored communication strategies to encourage PEP adoption among these distinct groups effectively. We categorized our subjects, residing in two districts of Chonburi province, Thailand, into three groups: (i) individuals with a history of dog bites who underwent PEP; (ii) individuals bitten by dogs who did not receive PEP; and (iii) individuals who had never been bitten. Subsequently, we employed an empathy map, a visual method, and a customer journey map to better understand the participants' experiences and perceptions. A total of 38 individuals were interviewed. We categorized the participants into three distinct personas: positive, neutral, and negative trends. Individuals classified within the positive trend strongly advocate for seeking rabies vaccines in the event of a dog bite. Meanwhile, individuals who have a neutral inclination are more likely to contemplate getting vaccinated following a dog bite, particularly if the injury is substantial. Those with a negative trend demonstrate a notable lack of attention or concern toward preventing rabies. A lack of attention to the potential severity of the issue characterizes their attitude. Notably, nearly half (44.74 %; 17/38) of the individuals involved in the study indicated utilizing interpersonal communication, followed by digital platforms (42.11 %; 16/38) and traditional communication channels (10.52 %; 5/38). Tailoring communication modalities to suit each specific group is crucial for effective outreach.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunityPersonaPostexposure prophylaxisRabies

Identifiers

PMID39931353
PMCPMC11808511

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.