Evidence mapPaperPMID 39931455Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2024

Enhancing access to primary care is critical to the future of an equitable health service: using process visualisation to understand the impact of national policy in the UK.

Ian Litchfield, Nicola Kay Gale, Sheila Greenfield, David Shukla, Micheal Burrows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian LitchfieldDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Nicola Kay GaleHealth Services Management Centre, College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Sheila GreenfieldDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
David ShuklaEve Hill Surgery, Dudley, United Kingdom.
Micheal BurrowsSchool of Psychology, University of Coventry, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to UK general practice is complicated by the need to provide equitable and universal care within a system adapting to workforce challenges, digital innovation, and unprecedented demand. Despite the importance of accessing primary care in meeting the overall aim of delivering equitable care, this is the first time the direct and indirect influence of policies intended to facilitate access have been systematically explored. Further consideration by policymakers is needed to accommodate the difference between what patients need and what patients want when accessing primary care, and the differences in their ability to utilise digital options. The designation of care was hindered by long-standing issues of reliable data and variations in the interpretation of local and national protocols and guidelines.

Indexed as

access and qualityNational Health Service Englandpolicy implementation and deliveryprimary careprocess visualization

Identifiers

PMID39931455
PMCPMC11807964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.