ArticleJAMIA open2025
AXpert: human expert facilitated privacy-preserving large language models for abdominal X-ray report labeling.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis from abdominal radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Insufficient reporting quality in large language model studies in the field of radiology.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Large Language Models Using Clinical Text in Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- AI Privacy and Security in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The lack of a publicly accessible abdominal X-ray (AXR) dataset has hindered necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) research. While significant strides have been made in applying natural language processing (NLP) to radiology reports, most efforts have focused on chest radiology. Development of an accurate NLP model to identify features of NEC on abdominal radiograph can support efforts to improve diagnostic accuracy for this and other rare pediatric conditions. Objectives: This study aims to develop privacy-preserving large language models (LLMs) and their distilled version to efficiently annotate pediatric AXR reports. Materials and Methods: Utilizing pediatric AXR reports collected from C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, we introduced AXpert in 2 formats: one based on the instruction-fine-tuned 7-B Gemma model, and a distilled version employing a BERT-based model derived from the fine-tuned model to improve inference and fine-tuning efficiency. AXpert aims to detect NEC presence and classify its subtypes-pneumatosis, portal venous gas, and free air. Results: Extensive testing shows that LLMs, including Axpert, outperforms baseline BERT models on all metrics. Specifically, Gemma-7B (F1 score: 0.9 ± 0.015) improves upon BlueBERT by 132% in F1 score for detecting NEC positive samples. The distilled BERT model matches the performance of the LLM labelers and surpasses expert-trained baseline BERT models. Discussion: Our findings highlight the potential of using LLMs for clinical NLP tasks. With minimal expert knowledge injections, LLMs can achieve human-like performance, greatly reducing manual labor. Privacy concerns are alleviated as all models are trained and deployed locally. Conclusion: AXpert demonstrates potential to reduce human labeling efforts while maintaining high accuracy in automating NEC diagnosis with AXR, offering precise image labeling capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.