Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931982›Full record

ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2025

Exploring the Dynamics of

Saurav Kumar Mishra, Anshuman Chandra, Namrata Mitra, Nikita Krishna, Nagendra Singh, Shopnil Akash, Yousef A Bin Jardan, Mohammed Bourhia, John J Georrge

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Saurav Kumar MishraDepartment of Bioinformatics, University of North Bengal, District-Darjeeling, Siliguri, 734013, West Bengal, India.
Anshuman ChandraSchool of Physical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Namrata MitraDepartment of Bioinformatics, University of North Bengal, District-Darjeeling, Siliguri, 734013, West Bengal, India.
Nikita KrishnaBiochemistry and Structural Biology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR-CDRI), Sector 10, Jankipuram Extension, Lucknow, India.
Nagendra SinghSchool of Biotechnology, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, India.
Shopnil AkashComputational Biology Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Yousef A Bin JardanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, PO Box, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed BourhiaSwalife Biotech Ltd, Unit 3D, North Point House, North Point Business Park, Cork, Ireland.
John J GeorrgeDepartment of Bioinformatics, University of North Bengal, District-Darjeeling, Siliguri, 734013, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9858-6112

Funding

King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia RSP2025R457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to screen the potential phytochemicals derived from Asparagus racemosus (Shatavari) against Thymidylate Kinase (TMPK) and D9 decapping enzyme, which is the vital target of the monkeypox virus and helps in the hostpathogen interaction mechanism, using integrated docking, QSAR analysis, and a molecular dynamics approach.

backgroundThe Monkeypox Virus (MPXV) is a recently emerging outbreak with ongoing infection cases. Drugs and vaccines for smallpox are being used to reduce the infection. However, no specific drugs or vaccines are available to combat this infection.

methodsThe TMPK and D9 decapping enzymes were retrieved from the MPXV virus UK strain in FASTA format. Due to the unavailability of an experimentally determined structure, the 3D structure was modelled via SWISS-MODEL and further enhanced and validated. The structure was subjected to docking analysis with the derived phytochemicals from Asparagus racemosus using a maestro module. The potential inhibitors were examined via QSAR analysis. Additionally, through MD simulation 250 ns, the stability was analyzed, and the MM-GBSA was employed to calculate the binding affinities.

resultsThe molecular investigation revealed asparoside-C (PubChem ID: 158598) and asparoside-D (PubChem ID: 158597) to be potential hits among others for both targets (TMPK and D9 decapping enzyme) compared to the reference drugs, i.e., tecovirimat, brincidofovir, and cidofovir, possessing antiviral and required bioactivity analyzed via the ADME and QSAR analyses. Moreover, the simulation study of over 250 ns revealed strong stability, followed by RMSD, RMSF, etc. The free energy calculation via MMGBSA exhibited strong affinities of asparoside-C and asparoside-D towards the TMPK and the D9 decapping enzyme according to their respective scores.

conclusionThe docking, QSAR, and simulation investigation revealed dual-target inhibitors activity of phytochemicals from Asparagus racemosus towards the MPXV via targeting TMPK and D9 decapping enzyme. It has been observed that asparoside-D and asparoside-C can potentially combat MPXV.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsAsparagus PlantEnzyme InhibitorsNucleoside-Phosphate KinasePhytochemicalsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAntiviral AgentsdTMP kinaseEnzyme InhibitorsNucleoside-Phosphate KinasePhytochemicalsAsparagus racemosusD9 decapping enzymemolecular dockingmonkeypox virusRMSF.thymidylate kinase

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.