ArticleThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing2025
Alternative Models of Cardiac Rehabilitation to Promote Secondary Prevention in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Scoping Review.
Article in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of integrated nurse-physician management in post-PCI coronary heart disease patients: an analysis based on follow-up data.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an effective secondary prevention strategy, it remains underutilized worldwide. Barriers to accessibility and adherence to traditional hospital-based programs have led to the development of alternative models, such as home-based CR, to improve healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.
objectiveIn this study, we aimed to map and synthesize evidence of effective home-based CR models for promoting secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.
methodsFollowing the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, we conducted a scoping review across 7 databases: Cochrane, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science, and gray literature sources. The search included primary English-language articles published in the last decade, with an update extending to October 2024. Reviewers independently assessed eligibility, and data extraction followed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication and PRISMA guidelines.
resultsAmong the 3296 initially identified articles, 23 met the inclusion criteria. The identified home-based CR models varied in duration (6 weeks to 6 months) and used a range of technological tools, such as Internet platforms and telecommunication, for exercise supervision and patient communication. These programs include supplementary equipment and educational resources to enhance patient self-efficacy and cardiovascular disease awareness.
conclusionsAll identified home-based CR models showed positive patient outcomes, with high program enrollment and adherence to secondary prevention measures. Further research is needed to compare different home-based CR models and assess their feasibility in diverse settings.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.