Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39932875›Full record

ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2025

The inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus: bridging phylogeny, ontogeny and functional anatomy.

Davide Giampiccolo, Guillaume Herbet, Hugues Duffau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Heritable and experience-dependent cortical traits of reading ability.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Electrophysiological features of signals recorded from white matter.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Davide GiampiccoloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3849-4168
Guillaume HerbetDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Medical Center, Montpellier 34295, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-254X
Hugues DuffauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Medical Center, Montpellier 34295, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6558-2342

Funding

Epilepsy Research Institute UK F2403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inferior-fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) is a long-range white matter tract that connects the prefrontal cortex with parietal, posterior temporal and occipital cortices. First identified in the 19th century through the pioneering studies of Mayo and Meynert using blunt dissection, its anatomy and function remain contentious topics. Structurally, its projections are well documented in human blunt dissection and tractography literature, yet its existence has been questioned by tract-tracing studies in macaques. Functionally, while traditional results from direct white matter stimulation during awake surgery suggested a contribution to language, recent evidence from stimulation and lesion data may indicate a broader role in executive control, extending to attention, motor cognition, memory, reading, emotion recognition and theory of mind. This review begins by examining anatomical evidence suggesting that the IFOF evolved in non-human primates to connect temporal and occipital cortices to prefrontal regions involved in context-dependent selection of visual features for action. We then integrate developmental, electrophysiological, functional and anatomical evidence for the human IFOF to propose it has a similar role in manipulation of visual features in our species-particularly when inhibition of overriding but task-irrelevant stimuli is required to prioritize a second, task-relevant stimulus. Next, we introduce a graded model in which dorsal (orbitofrontal, superior and middle frontal to precuneal, angular and supero-occipital projections) and ventral (inferior frontal to posterotemporal, basal temporal and infero-occipital) projections of the IFOF support perceptual or conceptual control of visual representations for action, respectively. Leveraging this model, we address controversies in the current literature regarding language, motor cognition, attention and emotion under the unifying view of cognitive control. Finally, we discuss surgical implications for this model and its impact on predicting and preventing neurological deficits in neurosurgery.

Indexed as

Frontal LobeOccipital LobeWhite MatterAnimalsHumansNeural Pathwaysbrain mappingcognitionIFOFsemantic controlsocial-semantic controlwhite matter stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39932875
PMCPMC12074009

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.