Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39933504›Full record

ArticleObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025

Health literacy and obesity: A systematic scoping review.

Ashleigh Upton, Dean Spirou, Matthew Craig, Natalie Saul, Olivia Winmill, Phillipa Hay, Jayanthi Raman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Violence in Healthcare Workers Is Associated with Disordered Eating.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Health literacy and obesity: A systematic scoping review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashleigh UptonSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8806-8899
Dean SpirouSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7073-7356
Matthew CraigSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Natalie SaulSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Olivia WinmillSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Phillipa HayTranslational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-6856
Jayanthi RamanSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1320-6177

Funding

Department of Education, Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a preventable global health epidemic that has serious health consequences. Health literacy has been identified as an underlying and modifiable factor in the development and maintenance of obesity. Adequate levels of health literacy have been shown to significantly impact on weight loss, weight loss maintenance, and associated health outcomes.

objectiveThe aim of the current study was to systematically review extant literature to evaluate the way in which health literacy is measured for individuals with obesity and to identify the key areas of health literacy that are commonly assessed.

methodThis systematic scoping review was conducted over five databases and yielded 12 papers (N

resultsThe review highlighted there are currently multiple measures that exist that assess independent or dual domains of health literacy; however, there were no studies that specifically utilized a measure that holistically assessed the three maintaining and modifiable domains of health literacy of obesity (psychological knowledge, nutritional knowledge, and knowledge about physical activity).

conclusionGiven the dearth of targeted health literacy measures for obesity, our findings highlighted a critical need to develop a distinct measure of health literacy for obesity to guide policy, research, education, and intervention.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyObesityExerciseHumansdisordered eatinghealth literacymeasuresobesity

Identifiers

PMID39933504
PMCPMC12069161

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.