Evidence mapPaperPMID 39933656Full record

ArticleAppetite2025

Selective increases in taste sensitivity to glucose as a function of hunger status.

Laura E Martin, Juyun Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura E MartinDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Juyun LimDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA; Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: JLim@Monell.org.

Funding

NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucose is critical for normal metabolic function in humans. Accordingly, the ability to sense glucose and glucose-containing saccharides is crucial for maintenance of energy homeostasis. Here, we report the evidence that glucose is perceived relatively stronger compared to fructose or sucralose when subjects are hungry. In the initial experiment, we measured the relative sensitivities between glucose and fructose when subjects were fasted vs. fed. Overnight fasted subjects (n = 22) completed a series of 3-AFC tests comparing one target (glucose from a range of concentrations) and two constants (200 mM fructose) before and after consuming mild-tasting breakfast sandwiches until satiated (738 ± 60 kcal). We found that the relative sensitivity to glucose as compared to fructose was significantly higher when individuals were hungry vs. satiated (p < 0.001). We replicated this finding by comparing the same range of glucose concentrations to a constant sucralose concentration (0.04 mM) (N = 19, p < 0.001). Importantly, when we compared a fixed concentration of sucralose (0.4 mM) to a range of fructose concentrations, we saw no difference in iso-intense concentration before and after eating (N = 19, p > 0.05). These findings support the hypothesis that hunger selectively increases taste sensitivity of glucose compared to other sweeteners.

Indexed as

GlucoseHungerTasteTaste PerceptionAdultBreakfastFastingFemaleFructoseHumansMaleSatiationSucroseYoung AdultFructoseGlucoseSucrosetrichlorosucroseGlucoseGlucose-specificHungerMonosaccharideSweetnessTaste

Identifiers

PMID39933656
PMCPMC11884995

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.