ArticleScientific reports2025
Multiple model visual feature embedding and selection method for an efficient oncular disease classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ODDM: Integration of SMOTE Tomek with Deep Learning on Imbalanced Color Fundus Images for Classification of Several Ocular Diseases.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Disease Detection : Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Diseases Detection.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of ocular diseases is vital to preventing severe complications, yet it remains challenging due to the need for skilled specialists, complex imaging processes, and limited resources. Automated solutions are essential to enhance diagnostic precision and support clinical workflows. This study presents a deep learning-based system for automated classification of ocular diseases using the Ocular Disease Intelligent Recognition (ODIR) dataset. The dataset includes 5,000 patient fundus images labeled into eight categories of ocular diseases. Initial experiments utilized transfer learning models such as DenseNet201, EfficientNetB3, and InceptionResNetV2. To optimize computational efficiency, a novel two-level feature selection framework combining Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and advanced neural network classifiers-Deep Neural Networks (DNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM)-was introduced. Among the tested approaches, the "Combined Data" strategy utilizing features from all three models achieved the best results, with the BiLSTM classifier attaining 100% accuracy, precision, and recall on the training set, and over 98% performance on the validation set. The LDA-based framework significantly reduced computational complexity while enhancing classification accuracy. The proposed system demonstrates a scalable, efficient solution for ocular disease detection, offering robust support for clinical decision-making. By bridging the gap between clinical demands and technological capabilities, it has the potential to alleviate the workload of ophthalmologists, particularly in resource-constrained settings, and improve patient outcomes globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.