ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Social capital and major depressive disorder among youth in Iran.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial capital has long been recognized as a determinant of various health outcomes. However, the existence and magnitude of these associations may vary across different health conditions, different communities, and periods. This study aimed to investigate the association between social capital and major depressive disorder (MDD) among participants of the Persian Youth Cohort (PYC) study.
methodsThe PYC study enrolled 11,592 participants aged 15-34 years, from four cities in Iran representing a range of geographic areas. Baseline assessments included measuring lifetime MDD using the Persian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-2.1) and a 27-item social capital questionnaire to evaluate voluntary participation, trust, and sense of cohesion. We analyzed the baseline data using logistic regression to identify potential associations.
resultsThe prevalence of lifetime MDD was 18.3%. The mean social capital-total score was 73.93 (SD = 13.93). A higher social capital-total score was inversely associated with the likelihood of MDD (AOR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.66-0.74). Moreover, participants with higher scores in voluntary participation (AOR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.92), trust (AOR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.62-0.68), and sense of cohesion (AOR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.68-0.75) were less probable to suffer from MDD.
conclusionOur study corroborates the existing evidence of the association between MDD and the three dimensions of social capital- participation, trust, and sense of cohesion- highlighting the consistency of these findings across diverse settings including young adults in Iran. The use of a valid diagnostic tool for assessing MDD adds robustness to our results, offering valuable insights for regions with similar social and cultural contexts. These findings suggest that interventions fostering social capital, particularly trust and cohesion, may help reduce the burden of MDD in youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.