Evidence mapPaperPMID 39934722Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Association between isolated abnormal 1-hour glucose challenge test and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective review from an urban tertiary care center in the United States.

Hillary Hosier, Lisbet S Lundsberg, Jennifer Culhane, Caitlin Partridge, Moeun Son

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hillary HosierDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. Hillary.hosier@emory.edu.
Lisbet S LundsbergDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Jennifer CulhaneDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Caitlin PartridgeDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Moeun SonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. Moeun.son@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001863 · YALE UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$9.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate whether an isolated abnormal 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT) among patients without gestational diabetes (GDM) is associated with adverse outcomes.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent GDM screening at ≥ 24 weeks' gestation with a 1-hour GCT and delivered a singleton fetus at > 35 weeks' gestation at an urban tertiary hospital from 1/2013 to 10/2021. Data were extracted from an electronic medical record data warehouse using standardized billing/diagnosis codes. Individuals were categorized into 3 groups: normal screening (1-hour GCT value < 140 mg/dL), intermediate screening (1-hour GCT value ≥ 140 and < 200 but normal 3-hour glucose tolerance test (GTT)), and GDM (1-hour GCT ≥ 200 mg/dL or abnormal 3-hour GTT). The primary composite perinatal morbidity outcome included any of the following: large for gestational age (LGA) birthweight, birth injury, hypoglycemia with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, apnea, NICU admission, or perinatal death. Multiple secondary outcomes were also evaluated. Bivariable analyses and multivariable logistic regression modeling were performed.

resultsOf 37,277 eligible patients, 29,698 (79.7%) had normal screening results, 5092 (13.7%) had intermediate screening results, and 2487 (6.6%) were diagnosed with GDM. There were significant differences in baseline characteristics between the three groups, including age, parity, race and ethnicity, payer-type, obesity, and pre-pregnancy metformin use. Compared to normal screening, intermediate screening was associated with an increased risk for the composite perinatal morbidity outcome (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.32), cesarean (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28-1.46), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.20-1.40). Associations for these outcomes were further pronounced in those with GDM compared to normal screening (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.70-2.03; OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.56-1.84; and OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.42-1.74, respectively). After adjusting for potential confounders, increased risks for the composite perinatal morbidity outcome persisted for those with intermediate screening (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10-1.26).

conclusionsIn addition to patients with GDM, individuals an isolated abnormal 1-hour GCT without GDM were also at increased risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Further investigation is needed to understand if patients with mild dysregulation may still benefit from other interventions.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalPregnancy OutcomeAdultBlood GlucoseFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersUnited StatesBlood GlucoseGestational diabetesGlucose challengeGlucose dysregulationGlucose intoleranceGlucose tolerancePerinatal outcomes

Identifiers

PMID39934722
PMCPMC11817534

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.