ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Effects of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation Combined With Functional Electrical Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Upper Extremity Fine Motor Function.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transcranial ultrasound stimulation for post-stroke dysfunction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFunctional electrical stimulation (FES) is used to retrain motor function in neurological disorders but typically requires multiple sessions and shows limited benefits in chronic cases. Low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) method offering greater focality and deeper penetration than current NIBS techniques. TUS delivered in a theta burst pattern (tbTUS) for 80 s produces neuroplastic changes with long-term potentiation-like effects lasting up to 60 min in healthy adults. Since tbTUS increases cortical excitability, combining it with FES may enhance neuroplasticity. We hypothesized that combining tbTUS with FES would result in increased corticospinal excitability compared to FES alone and lead to greater improvement in fine motor skills as assessed by Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT) scores.
methodsFifteen healthy participants underwent two study visits consisting of real or sham tbTUS of the left motor cortex immediately followed by 30 min of FES of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and the opponens pollicis (OP) muscles for fine motor function training of the right hand. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right FDI, OP, and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles at baseline (BL), immediately after real or sham tbTUS (T0), immediately after 30 min of FES training (T45), and at 15 (T65) and 30 min (T80) post-FES. NHPT was delivered at BL and at T80.
resultsData from 14 participants were analyzed. It showed a significant decrease in MEP amplitudes of FDI and OP at T45 following only real tbTUS+FES with a return to BL at T80. No significant changes were seen in the NHPT scores in either condition.
conclusionReal tbTUS+FES combined with voluntary movement results in immediate corticospinal inhibition with a return to BL at ∼20 min post-stimulation suggestive of homeostatic metaplasticity. These findings highlight the potential of tbTUS+FES as a neuromodulatory intervention, warranting further exploration in neurological conditions for therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.