Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935326›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025

Association of Cumulative Exposure to Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat With the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Qian Liu, Haozhe Cui, Fei Si, Yuntao Wu, Jing Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Haozhe CuiSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Fei SiDepartment of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Yuntao WuDepartment of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, Tangshan, China.
Jing YuDepartment of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-764X

Funding

Cuiying Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital CY2021-MS-A13Gansu province health research project GSWSKY2017-02International Science and Technology Cooperation Base PR0124002National Natural Science Foundation of China 82160089National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC 81960086Special Fund Project for Doctoral Training of the Lanzhou University Second Hospital YJS-BD-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated that metabolic score for visceral fat (METS-VF), a novel surrogate indicator assessing visceral fat, was associated with the risk of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality, predicting the risks based on a single METS-VF measurement can increase limitations of the study. Few studies have investigated the association between cumulative exposure to METS-VF and risk of CVD and all-cause mortality. We aimed to examine the association of cumulative METS-VF with risk for CVD and all-cause mortality.

methodsAll participants in the study were from the Kailuan Study, which is a large, prospective cohort study, and began in 2006 years. Cumulative METS-VF was calculated by data from 2006 survey to 2010 survey and defined as the mean METS-VF for each pair of consecutive surveys multiplied by the time intervals between these two consecutive surveys. The optimal cut-off value for time-averaged cumulative METS-VF associated with CVD was determined using a survival-time method to calculate maximally selected rank statistics and was used to assess exposure of high METS-VF. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality during 2010-2022 years (hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [95% CI]).

resultsWe included 41 756 participants (mean age, [52.72 ± 11.64] years, 78.53% males and 21.47% females). All participants were divided into four groups: Q1 (reference group), Q2, Q3 and Q4 according to the quartiles of cumulative METS-VF, and exposure duration of high METS-VF was quantified as 0, 2, 4, and 6 years. During the median follow-up of 12.01 years, 4008 (9.60%) CVD events and 3944 all-cause mortality events occurred. After adjusting for potential covariates, compared to participants in Q1 group, the HRs of incident CVD and all-cause mortality were 1.55 (95% CI, 1.38-1.74) and 1.59 (95% CI, 1.40-1.81) for those in Q2 group, 2.13 (95% CI, 1.91-2.38) and 2.67 (95% CI 2.37-3.01) for those in Q3 group, 2.78 (95% CI, 2.49-3.17) and 4.90 (95% CI 4.36-5.50) for those in Q4 group. The HRs for CVD and all-cause mortality were increased with exposure duration of high METS-VF increasing. The result of ROC curve analysis showed that cumulative METS-VF had the highest predictive for CVD among 4 indexes including cumulative METS-VF, cumulative waist circumference, cumulative body mass index and cumulative WHtR.

conclusionsThe high cumulative METS-VF was associated with an increased risk of CVD and mortality, and this association was stronger as exposure to high METS-VF was prolonged, emphasizing the importance of striving to control the METS-VF.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesIntra-Abdominal FatAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk Factorscardiovascular diseasecumulativemetabolic score for visceral fatprospective cohort study

Identifiers

PMID39935326
PMCPMC11814533

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.