ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2025
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Erythromycin for the Treatment of Gastroparesis in Infants and Children.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and Efficacy of Oral Azithromycin for Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in Pediatric Patients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesErythromycin has been utilized for gastroparesis and feeding intolerance in adults and neonates, but limited studies exist for infants and children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of erythromycin for gastroparesis in pediatric patients. The primary objective was to identify the number of patients with gastroparesis improvement, defined as no additional use of promotility agents, no erythromycin dose increases or need for other interventions (transpyloric or gastrostomy-jejunostomy tube). Secondary objectives included comparisons of clinical characteristics and outcomes between those with and without gastroparesis improvement and identification of patients with QTc prolongation following erythromycin initiation (QTc interval >450 ms or ≥25% increase from baseline).
methodsThis retrospective study included patients >28 days to <18 years of age receiving erythromycin for gastroparesis for ≥48 hours between August 1, 2019 to August 31, 2022. Comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon 2-sample test, χ
resultsGastroparesis improvement was noted in 40 (59.7%) of 67 included patients. Patients without improvement were significantly younger than those with improvement, median (IQR) 2 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.5 (1.5-6.5) years, respectively (p = 0.038). Patients with improvement had a significantly shorter treatment duration than those with no improvement, 4 (3-8) vs 9 (5-19) days (p = 0.01). Of the 37 patients who had an electrocardiogram obtained, 4 patients (10.8%) had QTc prolongation but did not develop dysrhythmias.
conclusionsThe majority had gastroparesis improvement with erythromycin therapy. Those without improvement were younger and had a longer erythromycin treatment course. QTc prolongation occurred in 4 patients; no dysrhythmias were noted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.