Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935557›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2025

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Erythromycin for the Treatment of Gastroparesis in Infants and Children.

Eugenie Chang, Maura Harkin, Jamie L Miller, Christina Walsh, Stephen B Neely, Peter N Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Safety and Efficacy of Oral Azithromycin for Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in Pediatric Patients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eugenie ChangDepartment of Pharmacy (EC), Bethany Children's Health Center, Bethany, OK.
Maura HarkinDepartment of Pharmacy (MH), Oklahoma Children's Hospital at OU Health, Oklahoma City, OK.
Jamie L MillerDepartment of Pharmacy: Clinical and Administrative Sciences (JLM, SBN, PNJ), College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Christina WalshDepartment of Pediatrics (CW), College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Stephen B NeelyDepartment of Pharmacy: Clinical and Administrative Sciences (JLM, SBN, PNJ), College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Peter N JohnsonDepartment of Pharmacy: Clinical and Administrative Sciences (JLM, SBN, PNJ), College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesErythromycin has been utilized for gastroparesis and feeding intolerance in adults and neonates, but limited studies exist for infants and children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of erythromycin for gastroparesis in pediatric patients. The primary objective was to identify the number of patients with gastroparesis improvement, defined as no additional use of promotility agents, no erythromycin dose increases or need for other interventions (transpyloric or gastrostomy-jejunostomy tube). Secondary objectives included comparisons of clinical characteristics and outcomes between those with and without gastroparesis improvement and identification of patients with QTc prolongation following erythromycin initiation (QTc interval >450 ms or ≥25% increase from baseline).

methodsThis retrospective study included patients >28 days to <18 years of age receiving erythromycin for gastroparesis for ≥48 hours between August 1, 2019 to August 31, 2022. Comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon 2-sample test, χ

resultsGastroparesis improvement was noted in 40 (59.7%) of 67 included patients. Patients without improvement were significantly younger than those with improvement, median (IQR) 2 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.5 (1.5-6.5) years, respectively (p = 0.038). Patients with improvement had a significantly shorter treatment duration than those with no improvement, 4 (3-8) vs 9 (5-19) days (p = 0.01). Of the 37 patients who had an electrocardiogram obtained, 4 patients (10.8%) had QTc prolongation but did not develop dysrhythmias.

conclusionsThe majority had gastroparesis improvement with erythromycin therapy. Those without improvement were younger and had a longer erythromycin treatment course. QTc prolongation occurred in 4 patients; no dysrhythmias were noted.

Indexed as

corrected QT intervalerythromycingastric motilitygastroparesispediatrics

Identifiers

PMID39935557
PMCPMC11809544

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.