Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935780›Full record

ArticleAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2025

A wicked problem: Systemic issues surrounding Canadian equestrian dressage and dressage horse welfare.

Megan Ross, Kathryn Proudfoot, Katrina Merkies, Charlotte Lundgren, Caroline Ritter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Megan RossUniversity of Prince Edward Island, Health Management, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1457-5318
Kathryn ProudfootUniversity of Prince Edward Island, Health Management, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-2431
Katrina MerkiesUniversity of Guelph Ontario Agricultural College, Animal Biosciences, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9462-4150
Charlotte LundgrenLinkoping University, Culture and Society, Linkoping, Ostergotland, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-0821
Caroline RitterUniversity of Prince Edward Island, Health Management, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7349-5241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competitive dressage's social licence to operate is in jeopardy due to ethical concerns surrounding the use of horses for dressage. There is limited research that contributes to our understanding of Canadian equestrian perspectives on the use of horses in dressage. The objectives of this study were to: (1) explore the cultural context of the Canadian dressage industry, including how horse well-being is integrated within the culture; and (2) investigate coaches' and riders' perceptions and experiences with the use of horses for dressage. An ethnographic case study approach was employed, where MR spent 2-6 weeks with each of the four participating Equestrian Canada Certified dressage coaches and their riders (at least four riders per coach for a total of 19 riders). Data collection included direct observation, recording field notes and conducting at least one in-depth interview with each coach and rider. Interviews and field notes were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis leading to the development of three themes: (1) the systems that participants operate within; (2) how these systems foster a culture of contradiction in the industry; and (3) the 'equestrian dilemma' highlighting how participants navigate their love for horses with their horses' well-being amid the sport's demands. The three themes portray that the issues faced by the dressage industry may be rooted in systemic problems and could be described as a 'wicked problem'. These results aim to inform future research initiatives that promote a holistic understanding of the challenges faced by the dressage industry and promote systems thinking solutions.

Indexed as

animal welfarecognitive dissonanceeducationequitation scienceFédération Equestre Internationalehorse welfare

Identifiers

PMID39935780
PMCPMC11810510

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.