Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936360›Full record

ReviewHealth promotion international2025

Unpacking family meals: state-of-the-art review critiquing the Western ideals, positioning and promotion of family meals.

Fairley Le Moal, Eloise-Kate Litterbach, Katherine Dunn, Kylie Fraser, Celeste C Bouchaud, Georgia Middleton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fairley Le MoalCentre Max Weber UMR 5283, Maison des Sciences de l'Homme Lyon St-Étienne, 14 Avenue Berthelot, 69363 Lyon Cedex 07, France.ORCID 0009-0001-2280-3352
Eloise-Kate LitterbachAustralian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Suite G01, 15-31 Pelham Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
Katherine DunnSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Kylie FraserSchool of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
Celeste C BouchaudFaculty of Land and Food Systems, Food Nutrition and Health, The University of British Columbia, 2205 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Georgia MiddletonFlinders University, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Tarntanya, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2456-9122

Funding

Deakin University PhD ScholarshipKing and Amy O'Malley Trust Postgraduate ScholarshipQueensland University of Technology Research Training StipendUniversity of British Columbia 4 Year PhD Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family meals are a familiar concept and are practised in many Western households. While academics have been researching family meals for decades, there is much about the family meal we still do not understand. Meanwhile, the promotion of an 'ideal' of family meals across media, health and social discourse ensues. An extensive pool of research has indicated cross-sectional associations between the frequency of family meals and optimal health outcomes. However, evidence surrounding what specifically it is about the family meal that could offer health benefits is limited. Furthermore, family meals carry a level of moral value, evoking pressure for parents to 'achieve' a family meal ideal, unattainable for many. Family meals research has traditionally focussed on mothers' perceptions and roles in family mealtimes. While literature is starting to emerge on the often-overlooked cognitive contribution required to plan and execute family meals, little structural supports exist to streamline these efforts or make them more achievable for contemporary families. The published literature is only starting to include cultural and demographic diversity, making it difficult to understand and promote realistic and feasible family meals across populations. The popular depiction of family meals needs to evolve alongside changes in social norms. Our call to action to address these issues is to draw on existing family meal practices, continue to diversify our investigations, and broaden our definitions and understandings of what a family meal is or could be, and how it should be measured.

Indexed as

FamilyFeeding BehaviorHealth PromotionMealsHumanschildrencommensalityfamilyfamily mealshealth-promoting environmentsidealspublic health

Identifiers

PMID39936360
PMCPMC11815278

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.