ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2025
Urine Metabolites of Suspected Community-Acquired Pneumonia.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliability of Physical Examination Findings in Youths Diagnosed With Pneumonia.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) can be challenging. Clinical findings are nonspecific, and interpretations of chest radiographs have poor interrater reliability. Pilot studies demonstrate the potential for metabolomics to identify metabolite concentrations that differentiate children with CAP from those without. The objective of this study was to expand these findings in a large cohort of children with CAP compared with controls.
methodsUrine was collected from children, 3 months to 12 years old, with emergency department visits for suspected CAP and community-based controls. Magnetic resonance spectrometry was used to identify and quantify metabolites. A random forest approach developed 3 models discriminating case patients from community-based controls based on (1) clinical signs and symptoms, (2) metabolites, and (3) the combination of both. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed for each model.
resultsIncluded were 253 case patients and 122 controls. The metabolite-only model had similar discriminatory ability as the combination model (AUC, 0.97 and 0.99, respectively). The discriminating metabolites in the metabolite-only model were 2-aminobutyrate, fumarate, hypoxanthine, acetone, leucine, quinolinate, valine, O-acetylcarnitine, citrate, and trigonelline. In the combined model, discriminatory clinical factors included receipt of corticosteroids, fever, cough, rapid breathing, decreased oral intake, difficulty breathing, receipt of albuterol, abnormal sleepiness, vomiting, and wheezing and included 5 additional metabolites compared with the metabolite-only model (4-hydroxybenzoate, isoleucine, carnitine, 2-hydroxyisovalerate, betaine, and succinate).
conclusionsUrine metabolite concentrations can accurately discriminate healthy children from children with suspected CAP. Metabolites associated with CAP may overcome limitations of prior diagnostic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.