ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025
Mechanisms of Proactive Adaptation in a Rewarded Response Inhibition Task: Executive, Motor, or Attentional Effects?
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A growing number of studies have demonstrated the effects of reward motivation on inhibitory control performance. However, the exact neurocognitive mechanisms supporting these effects are not fully elucidated. In this preregistered study, we test the hypothesis that changes in speed-accuracy trade-off across contexts that alternatively incentivize fast responses versus accurate inhibition rely on a modulation of proactive inhibitory control, a mechanism intended to lock movement initiation in anticipation of stimulus presentation. Thirty healthy participants performed a modified Go/NoGo task in which the motivation to prioritize Go vs. NoGo successes was manipulated using monetary rewards of different magnitudes. High-density EEG was recorded throughout the task. Source-space analyses were performed to track brain oscillatory activities consistent with proactive inhibitory control. We observed that participants adapted their behavior to the motivational context but found no evidence that this adaptation relied on a modulation of proactive inhibitory control, hence failing to provide support for our pre-registered hypothesis. Unplanned analyses of brain-behavior relationships suggested an association between faster reaction times and enhanced top-down attention to the stimuli associated with larger rewards, as well as between increased commission error rates and stronger motor activations when Go stimuli were associated with larger rewards. The latter was related to inter-individual differences in trait reward responsiveness. These results highlight the need to carefully parse the different contributing mechanisms when studying the influence of reward motivation on inhibitory performance in impulsivity disorders. Exploratory results suggest alternative mechanisms that may be directly tested in further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39939462What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.