Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39939549›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of biomedical engineering2025

Sleep Apnea Detection Using EEG: A Systematic Review of Datasets, Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Shireen Fathima, Maaz Ahmed

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shireen FathimaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, HKBK College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560045, India. shireen.fathima6@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-020X
Maaz AhmedDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, HKBK College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560045, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSleep Apnea (SA) affects an estimated 936 million adults globally, posing a significant public health concern. The gold standard for diagnosing SA, polysomnography, is costly and uncomfortable. Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based SA detection is promising due to its ability to capture distinctive sleep stage-related characteristics across different sub-band frequencies. This study aims to review and analyze research from the past decade on the potential of EEG signals in SA detection and classification focusing on various deep learning and machine learning techniques, including signal decomposition, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification methodologies.

methodA systematic literature review using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and PICO guidelines was conducted across 5 databases for publications from January 2010 to December 2024.

resultsThe review involved screening a total of 402 papers, with 63 selected for in-depth analysis to provide valuable insights into the application of EEG signals for SA detection. The findings underscore the potential of EEG-based methods in improving SA diagnosis.

conclusionThis study provides valuable insights, showcasing significant advancements while identifying key areas for further exploration, thereby laying a strong foundation for future research in EEG-based SA detection.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographySleep Apnea SyndromesDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningElectroencephalogramMachine LearningObstructive Sleep ApneaSleep ApneaSleep Apnea DatasetSystematic Literature review

Identifiers

PMID39939549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.