ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025
Integrating synthetic polypeptides with innovative material forming techniques for advanced biomedical applications.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complexation of Polypeptides and Polypeptoids with Nucleic Acids: Does Chirality Matter for Salt Stability and Morphology?Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Raft Selectivity of a Cholesterol Probe Capable of Forming an H-Bond with Phospholipids.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Electrospinning and Cross-Linking of Gelatin-Poly(2-Isopropenyl-2-Oxazoline) Nanofibers: A Route to Stable Hybrid Biomaterials.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2026Article
- α-Helical peptides: design strategies and recent advances in biomedical applications.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Biocontrol and Nanotechnology Strategies for Postharvest Disease Management in Fruits and Vegetables: A Comprehensive Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Targeted Drug Delivery to the Spleen and Its Implications for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polypeptides are highly valued in biomedical science for their biocompatibility and biodegradability, making them valuable in drug delivery, tissue engineering, and antibacterial dressing. The diverse design of polymer chains and self-assembly techniques allow different side chains and secondary structures, enhancing their biomedical potential. However, the traditional solid powder form of polypeptides presents challenges in skin applications, shipping, and recycling, limiting their practical utility. Recent advancements in material forming methods and polypeptide synthesis have produced biomaterials with uniform, distinct shapes, improving usability. This review outlines the progress in polypeptide synthesis and material-forming methods over the past decade. The main synthesis techniques include solid-phase synthesis and ring-opening polymerization of N-carboxyanhydrides while forming methods like electrospinning, 3D printing, and coating are explored. Integrating structural design with these methods is emphasized, leading to diverse polypeptide materials with unique shapes. The review also identifies research hotspots using VOSviewer software, which are visually presented in circular packing images. It further discusses emerging applications such as drug delivery, wound healing, and tissue engineering, emphasizing the crucial role of material shape in enhancing performance. The review concludes by exploring future trends in developing distinct polypeptide shapes for advanced biomedical applications, encouraging further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.