ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
A comparison of international clinical practice guidelines for postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recommendations from guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in pregnant women with inherited thrombophilia.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the clinical performance of a risk scoring model for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in cesarean section for a largely Chinese population.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Postpartum Venous Thromboembolism: Altitudinal Gradients, Decadal Trends, and PE-Specific Risk Profiling in Highland Populations.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Risk Stratification and Safety Profile of Pharmacological Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Postpartum Women Following Cesarean Section: A Comparative Evaluation.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous thromboembolism is a leading cause of maternal death worldwide. The postpartum period is a time of particularly increased risk. International guidelines provide recommendations for when a woman should be offered thromboembolism prophylaxis, however they differ greatly in their criteria as to which women qualify for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The aim of this study was to determine the most common risk factors for women being recommended LMWH and compare the proportion of women who would qualify for postpartum LMWH according to four international guidelines. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study evaluated rates of postpartum LMWH prophylaxis by applying guideline recommendations from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ). Demographic, medical and obstetric risk factors for venous thromboembolism were identified for individual women from one regional and two tertiary maternity hospitals in New South Wales, Australia between February and October 2022.
resultsA total of 338 women were included in the analyses. By applying RCOG guidelines, 53.6% of women would have qualified for postpartum LMWH compared with 40.2% of women using SOMANZ guidelines, 37.3% using SOGC guidelines, and 8.3% using ACCP guidelines. The most common risk factors were caesarean birth, maternal age greater than 35 years, body mass index above 30 kg/m
conclusionsThere are considerable differences in the rates of women receiving postpartum pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis when recommendations from different international guidelines are applied. These differences reflect the wide variation in guideline recommendations for the use of LMWH following birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.