Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39939968›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

A comparison of international clinical practice guidelines for postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Sarah Ephraums, Amrita Dasgupta, Soumya Korah, Dharmintra Pasupathy, Sean Seeho

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk Stratification and Safety Profile of Pharmacological Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Postpartum Women Following Cesarean Section: A Comparative Evaluation.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah EphraumsNorthern Sydney (Arabanoo) Precinct, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6201-6378
Amrita DasguptaNorthern Sydney (Arabanoo) Precinct, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Soumya KorahWestmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dharmintra PasupathyWestmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sean SeehoNorthern Sydney (Arabanoo) Precinct, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. sean.seeho@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous thromboembolism is a leading cause of maternal death worldwide. The postpartum period is a time of particularly increased risk. International guidelines provide recommendations for when a woman should be offered thromboembolism prophylaxis, however they differ greatly in their criteria as to which women qualify for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The aim of this study was to determine the most common risk factors for women being recommended LMWH and compare the proportion of women who would qualify for postpartum LMWH according to four international guidelines. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study evaluated rates of postpartum LMWH prophylaxis by applying guideline recommendations from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ). Demographic, medical and obstetric risk factors for venous thromboembolism were identified for individual women from one regional and two tertiary maternity hospitals in New South Wales, Australia between February and October 2022.

resultsA total of 338 women were included in the analyses. By applying RCOG guidelines, 53.6% of women would have qualified for postpartum LMWH compared with 40.2% of women using SOMANZ guidelines, 37.3% using SOGC guidelines, and 8.3% using ACCP guidelines. The most common risk factors were caesarean birth, maternal age greater than 35 years, body mass index above 30 kg/m

conclusionsThere are considerable differences in the rates of women receiving postpartum pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis when recommendations from different international guidelines are applied. These differences reflect the wide variation in guideline recommendations for the use of LMWH following birth.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsGuideline AdherenceHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightPractice Guidelines as TopicVenous ThromboembolismAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHeparinLow-molecular-weightPostpartumPractice guidelinePregnancyThromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID39939968
PMCPMC11823154

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.