Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39940071›Full record

ArticleIntegrative zoology2026

Two-Step Loss of GLUTs in the High-Metabolism Passerines.

Lei Wu, Yanzhu Ji, Fumin Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei WuKey Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanzhu JiKey Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fumin LeiKey Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32130013the China Scholarship Council Innovative Talent Programme 202310500002the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2023IOZ0104the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2601601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucose transporters (GLUTs) play vital roles in cellular metabolism. Understanding their evolutionary dynamics in birds is essential for elucidating avian physiology and adaptation. However, the choice of gene detection method in gene family analysis may affect the conclusion. Here, we present a comprehensive investigation of methodologies and GLUT gene loss events in avian lineages, focusing on the loss of GLUT4 and GLUT8. To illustrate the effects of these methods, we first employed BUSCO-based homolog identification, calculated pairwise evolutionary distances between different species, and performed separate blastn and blastp searches to identify homologs in two groups of animals. Our analyses revealed a significant decline in blastn accuracy with increasing evolutionary distance, represented by relative divergence times. Through a more robust blastp-based gene detection pipeline, we provide evidence for the loss of GLUT genes in birds based on 58 vertebrate genomes, including 47 bird species. Our results support the reported early loss of GLUT4 in Aves. We also newly emphasize the absence of GLUT8 in passerines, potentially due to adaptation to high-sugar diets in their ancestors. These findings enhance our knowledge of avian metabolism and the evolution of GLUT genes.

Indexed as

Glucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativePasseriformesAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGlucose Transporter Type 4PhylogenyGlucose Transporter Type 4Glucose Transport Proteins, Facilitativefacilitated glucose transportergene family analysisGLUT4GLUT8passerines

Identifiers

PMID39940071
PMCPMC13574176

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.