SynthesisNutrients2025
The Application and Mechanism Analysis of Enteral Nutrition in Clinical Management of Chronic Diseases.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with achieving adequate caloric delivery immediately after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective observational study.Clinical nutrition research · 2026Article
- Article
- Functional Ingredients: From Molecule to Market-AI-Enabled Design, Bioavailability, Consumer Impact, and Clinical Evidence.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Microfluidic Approach for Profiling Total Nitrogen Content in Age-Specific Nutritional Formulas Using Microchip Gel Electrophoresis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based predictive model for enteral nutrition-associated diarrhea in ICU patients and its nursing applications.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Effects of preoperative nutritional support combined with esketamine on recovery and analgesia after thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer in elderly patients.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic diseases have emerged as a significant challenge in global public health due to their complex etiologies, prolonged disease courses, and high treatment costs. With the aging population and changes in lifestyle, the number of patients with chronic diseases has increased dramatically, which has brought heavy burden to families and society. Chronic diseases are often accompanied by digestive and absorptive disorders as well as metabolic disorders, resulting in insufficient nutrient intake, further worsening the condition and weakening the physique. Therefore, the importance of nutritional intervention in chronic disease management has become increasingly prominent. As an important means of nutritional intervention, enteral nutrition plays a key role in improving the nutritional status of patients, promoting rehabilitation, shortening hospital stay and so on, thereby providing a new solution for chronic disease management. This article reviews the current application status, mechanism of action and comprehensive benefit of enteral nutrition in the clinical management of chronic diseases. Through systematic review and analysis of existing research findings, the specific application effects and mechanisms of enteral nutrition in chronic disease management are clarified. This review aims to promote the popularization and application of enteral nutrition, in order to effectively improve patients' treatment outcomes and quality of life, provide scientific evidence for the optimization of clinical management strategies for chronic diseases, and offer theoretical support for the development of enteral nutrition products, and thereby drive the continuous improvement of chronic disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.