Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39940376›Full record

ReviewNutrients2025

Unlocking Opportunities and Overcoming Challenges in Genetically Engineered Biofortification.

Abdullah Mohammad Shohael, Jojo Kelly, Srividhya Venkataraman, Kathleen Hefferon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdullah Mohammad ShohaelCell Genetics and Plant Biotechnology Lab, Department of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-3879-2464
Jojo KellySchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Srividhya VenkataramanDepartment of Cell Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada.
Kathleen HefferonDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-0366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micronutrient deficiencies affect over three billion people globally; there is a particularly severe problem with iron and zinc nutrition in developing countries. While several strategies exist to combat these deficiencies, biofortification has emerged as a powerful and sustainable approach to enhance the nutritional value of staple crops. This review examines recent advances in crop biofortification and their potential to address global nutritional challenges. We present successful case studies including iron-enriched cassava, nutrient-enhanced tomatoes, and omega-3-fortified oilseed crops, demonstrating the diverse possibilities for improving nutritional outcomes. The integration of novel plant-based protein production techniques has further expanded opportunities for sustainable nutrition. However, significant challenges remain, including complex environmental interactions, regulatory considerations, and sociocultural barriers to adoption. Economic analyses suggest biofortification offers substantial return on investment, with every dollar invested generating up to seventeen dollars in benefits through reduced disease burden. As global food security challenges intensify due to climate change, biofortified crops represent a crucial tool for improving nutritional outcomes, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. We conclude by examining emerging opportunities and future directions in this rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

BiofortificationCrops, AgriculturalFood, FortifiedGenetic EngineeringPlants, Genetically ModifiedDeveloping CountriesHumansManihotMicronutrientsNutritive ValueMicronutrientsfood fortificationfood systemshealth outcomesmalnutritionmicronutrientsmolecular farmingnutrition status

Identifiers

PMID39940376
PMCPMC11821181

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.