Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39940699›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Network Pharmacology and Bioinformatics Study of Six Medicinal Food Homologous Plants Against Colorectal Cancer.

Xinyue Zhao, Jian Xiu, Hengzheng Yang, Weiwei Han, Yue Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Targeting CDK2 and AURKA with Cerevisterol fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Suppressive Potential of Ethanolic Extracts ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Anti-Metastatic Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinyue ZhaoKey Laboratory for Molecular Enzymology and Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Jian XiuKey Laboratory for Molecular Enzymology and Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Hengzheng YangKey Laboratory for Molecular Enzymology and Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Weiwei HanKey Laboratory for Molecular Enzymology and Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1931-9316
Yue JinKey Laboratory for Molecular Enzymology and Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.ORCID 0009-0003-4531-9250

Funding

Jilin Provincial Scientific and Technological Development Program 20210402018GH, 20220101276JC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating network pharmacological analysis and bioinformatic techniques, this study systematically investigated the molecular mechanisms of six medicinal food homologous plants (

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyNetwork PharmacologyPlants, MedicinalGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMolecular Docking SimulationTumor Microenvironmentbioinformaticscolorectal cancermedicinal food homologous plantsnetwork pharmacologytraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID39940699
PMCPMC11817456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.