ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Biodistribution of Polyaldehydedextran Nanoparticle-Encapsulated Epirubicin in Ovarian Tumor-Bearing Mice via Optical Imaging.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the biodistribution of polysaccharide-based nanoparticles loaded with epirubicin (POLEPI) compared to epirubicin hydrochloride (EPI) in naïve female nude mice following a single intravenous dose. The inherent fluorescence of epirubicin was tracked using Newton 7 animal imager and Varioskan. Initial whole-animal optical imaging failed to reliably detect epirubicin distribution, necessitating ex vivo imaging of key tissues harvested at intervals between 10 min and 48 h post-injection. Optimal imaging conditions were established using a 5 s exposure time with excitation (Ex)/emission (Em) at 480 nm/550 nm. The biodistribution of POLEPI was further evaluated in both naïve mice and immunocompromised mice bearing patient-derived ovarian tumors. Unlike epirubicin, POLEPI exhibited notable tissue distribution within 3 h post-injection. By 48 h, fluorescence signals were undetectable in both models, although non-tumored animals exhibited persistent signals. In both models, the liver was the primary organ for POLEPI accumulation, with lower levels in tumored mice. Interestingly, brain fluorescence was higher in POLEPI-treated mice compared to those receiving epirubicin. Neither POLEPI nor epirubicin accumulated in the spleen or bone marrow. In tumors, POLEPI fluorescence peaked at 24 h, with levels 2.1 times higher than in the epirubicin-treated group over a 48 h period. Furthermore, POLEPI uptake in tumors exceeded that in healthy ovaries, with the most significant tumor-to-healthy-ovary ratio observed between 6 and 24 h post-injection. These findings demonstrate that POLEPI, a novel polyaldehydedextran nanoparticle formulation, exhibits enhanced accumulation and retention in tumor tissue compared to epirubicin, with preferential distribution to the orthotopic tumor-bearing ovary over healthy ovarian tissue. The inherent fluorescence of epirubicin provided a rapid and cost-effective means of estimating biodistribution, although the limitations of this method-particularly, the inability to differentiate between the parent drug and its metabolites-were acknowledged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.