ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Quantitative Analysis of Propofol Dosage in Cannabis Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Risk Substance and Polysubstance Use Among Elective Surgery Patients: Prevalence and Risk Factors.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2026Article
- Sedative and anesthetic-sparing effects of perioperative full-spectrum cannabis oil in female dogs undergoing unilateral mastectomy and ovariohysterectomy.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Comparison of Perspectives on Cannabis Use Between Emergency Department Patients Who Are Users and Non-users.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Perioperative Repercussions of Cannabis Use-Implications for GI Endoscopy Sedation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review of cannabis use and propofol anesthesia: recent insights and clinical implications.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.