ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025
Nanopore Sequencing of Amoebophrya Species Reveals Novel Collection of Bacteria Putatively Associated With Karlodinium veneficum.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Read Sequencing Unlocks New Insights into theMarine drugs · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dinoflagellate parasite Amoebophrya sp. ex Karlodinium veneficum plays a major role in controlling populations of the toxic bloom-forming dinoflagellate K. veneficum and is one of the few cultured representatives of Marine Alveolate Group II. The obligate parasitic nature of this Amoebophrya spp. precludes isolation in culture, and therefore, genomic characterization of this parasite relies on metagenomic sequencing. Whole-genome sequencing of an Amoebophrya sp. ex K. veneficum-infected culture using Nanopore long reads revealed a diverse community of novel bacteria as well as several species previously reported to be associated with algae. In sum, 39 metagenome-assembled genomes were assembled, and less than half of these required binning of multiple contigs. Seven were abundant but of unknown genera, 13 were identifiable at the generic level by BLAST (8 of which were apparently complete single-contig genomes), and the remaining 19 comprised less abundant (individually accounting for <2% of the total bacterial reads in the culture) and often rarer and/or novel species. Attempts to culture strains identified through sequencing revealed that only two of these bacterial isolates were readily amenable to cultivation, stressing the importance of a dual culture- and sequencing-based approach for robust community analysis. Functional annotations of metagenome-assembled genomes are presented here to support the characterization of a microbial community associated with K. veneficum and/or Amoebophrya sp. ex K. veneficum cultured from the Chesapeake Bay and give preliminary insights into the nature of the associations these bacteria have with this parasite-host complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.