Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943779›Full record

ReviewFolia parasitologica2025

Thirty years of studying latent toxoplasmosis: behavioural, physiological, and health insights.

Jaroslav Flegr

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Folia parasitologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From cats to cortex:Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond Latency: ChronicBiomedicines · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jaroslav FlegrDepartment of Philosophy and History of Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000000208220126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, I recount the journey of discovering the effects of latent toxoplasmosis on human psychology, behaviour, morphology, and health as I observed it from the closest perspective over the past 30+ years, during which our laboratory has been intensely focused on this research. I trace how we moved from the initial observations of differences between infected and uninfected individuals in certain personality traits to the systematic study of similar differences in behaviour, both in the laboratory and in everyday life, as well as in physiological and even morphological traits. This eventually led us to investigate the causal relationships behind these observed associations and their molecular basis. I describe some of the unexpected discoveries our research revealed - whether it was the impact of toxoplasmosis on the human sexual index, the prenatal and postnatal development, the sexual preferences and behaviour, the modulatory effect of blood Rh factor on toxoplasmosis, or the discovery of sexual transmission of toxoplasmosis. In exploring whether the toxoplasmosis-associated effects were merely side effects of an ongoing latent infection, we gradually uncovered that seemingly asymptomatic toxoplasmosis has profound (and certainly not positive) effects on the mental and physical health of infected individuals. The article also includes three separate boxes that discuss some key methodological challenges we encountered along the way, such as how to distinguish the effect of infection from mere statistical association, or how to differentiate parasitic manipulation from a simple side effect.

Indexed as

ToxoplasmosisAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansSexual Behaviorbehaviourchronic toxoplasmosisdopaminemanipulationmental healthmorbidityparasite.personalityphysical healthRh factorschizophreniasex ratiotestosteroneToxoplasma

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.