ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2024
Prostate brachytherapy boost: Long-term results of protocol-based treatment of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polish Brachytherapy Society clinical recommendations and expert consensus on radical high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of interstitial temporary brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer patients using real-world data. Material and methods: Between 2008 and 2016, 115 patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by a brachytherapy boost (BT boost) were eligible for this retrospective analysis. Patients received either interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with 2 x 9-9.5 Gray (Gy) schedule or pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) with 35 Gy as boost after EBRT (50.4 Gy), up to a total dose of 86-98 Gy (EQD Results: The median follow-up time was 87 (range, 9-159) months, and the median age was 72 (range, 48-83) years. The median prostate specific antigen value (PSA) was 12.2 (range, 2.4-288) ng/ml. 78/115 (68%) patients had high-risk prostate cancer according to the D'Amico classification. At 7 years, the cumulative LRR for the whole cohort was 1.8%. The 7-year bRFS, cancer-specific survival, and OS were 85.2%, 97.3%, and 88.9%. The 5-year prevalence of late toxicity grade 3 or higher according to the LENT-SOMA scale was 4%. There were no significant differences for treatment outcome or toxicity for HDR vs. PDR treatment. A prostate gland of 50 cm Conclusions: BT boost in patients with prostate cancer is efficient and well-tolerated, with low rates of side effects also in elderly patients. HDR- and PDR-BT were equally efficient and well-tolerated. A large prostate gland is no contraindication for BT. Therefore, BT boost should be offered to all eligible patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.