ReviewIntegrative medicine research2025
Acupuncture-related therapy for chronic cough: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Integrative medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World patterns of Korean medicine and combined Korean-Western medicine use in patients with chronic cough at Korean medicine institutions: a nationwide cohort study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture as Adjunctive Therapy for Cough Variant Asthma: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- A survey on the current status of Korean Medicine practices for asthma among Korean Medicine doctors.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Integrative Approach to Somatic (Psychogenic) Cough in a Geriatric Female Patient: A Case Study.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the high prevalence and socioeconomic burden of chronic cough, there has been an unmet medical need. Acupuncture may be promising for treating chronic cough with various pathophysiologies involving several neurotransmission mechanisms. We aimed to systematically compile evidence on the effect and safety of acupuncture-related therapy for chronic cough. Methods: Through a search of 11 databases, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until February 15, 2024 that evaluated the effect of acupuncture-related therapy at acupuncture points (including acupuncture, acupoint herbal patching, and moxibustion) for patients with chronic cough were identified and analyzed without restrictions on the cause of cough or age. When there were two or more studies that measured the same outcome measures, a meta-analysis was performed, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated based on the GRADE methodology. Results: A total of 30 RCTs with 2835 participants were included. When acupuncture-related therapy was implemented in addition to conventional treatment including medicine and lifestyle guidance according to symptoms and causes, cough severity, cough-related quality of life, and the total effective rate (TER) were significantly improved with no difference in the incidence of adverse events. Furthermore, compared with conventional treatment, acupuncture-related therapy significantly improved cough severity and the TER. The certainty of the evidence was generally moderate due to the risk of bias. The most frequently used acupuncture points in the included studies were BL13, GV14, CV17, and EX-B1. Conclusion: Acupuncture-related therapy might be an effective and safe treatment for patients with chronic cough of various causes with complex pathophysiologies. Protocol registration: PROSPERO, CRD42024518115. PROSPERO (CRD42024518115).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.