Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944254›Full record

ArticleCentral-European journal of immunology2024

Differential diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis variants and biomarker identification: current progress.

Bartosz Hanczaruk, Aleksandra Roszko, Kamil Kamiński, Marlena Tynecka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central-European journal of immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bartosz HanczarukCentre of Regenerative Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Aleksandra RoszkoCentre of Regenerative Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Kamil KamińskiCentre of Regenerative Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Marlena TyneckaCentre of Regenerative Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a disease characterized by dysregulated type 2 (T2) immune responses with enormous eosinophilic infiltration restricted to the oesophagus. Currently, the gold standard for EoE diagnosis involves identification of oesophageal dysfunction symptoms followed by the detection of at least 15 infiltrating eosinophils per high-power field in the oesophagus. Unfortunately, achieving 90% sensitivity in EoE histology-based diagnosis requires 5-6 biopsy samples to be collected from both the distal and proximal oesophagus, hindering precise diagnosis in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the development of novel diagnostic approaches differentiating EoE from other EoE-like diseases as well as identifying active and non-active forms of EoE is required. In line with the previously advanced EoE diagnostic panel (EDP), in a recent paper published in Gut (BMJ Journals), Gueguen et al. introduced a Histologically Active EoE Diagnostic Panel (HAEDP) effectively distinguishing patients with the active form of the disease from remission regardless of the fibrosis status and biopsy site. Here, we summarize recent findings and achievements in the development of the differential diagnosis of EoE based on the identification of unique deregulation in gene expression.

Indexed as

diagnostic paneldifferential diagnosiseosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE)fibrosisGERD

Identifiers

PMID39944254
PMCPMC11811723

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.