ArticleHeliyon2025
A novel gene signature for predicting outcome in colorectal cancer patients based on tumor cell-endothelial cell interaction via single-cell sequencing and machine learning.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress Regarding the Use of Single-Cell Sequencing Technology in Analyzing Tumor Endothelial Cell Pathophysiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- PIAS1 Shapes a Tumor-Suppressive Microenvironment by Suppressing Immune Evasion in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of Cancer Cell Lymphatic Endothelialization in Tumor Lymphangiogenesis and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The intricate interactions between malignant cells and endothelial cells (ECs) are crucial in the progress of colorectal cancer (CRC). Identifying molecular signatures associated with this interaction could yield critical prognostic insights and inform personalized therapeutic approaches. Methods: We conducted an in silico study integrating single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk transcriptome data to characterize the cellular heterogeneity of CRC. Through computational cell interaction analysis facilitated the elucidation of signaling dynamics among cell subpopulations linked to CRC prognosis. Prognostic signatures were developed using various machine learning algorithms based on marker genes linked to the identified cell subpopulations. Immune cell infiltration assessment and gene enrichment analysis were performed to characterize CRC patients stratified by the signature. Results: Our analysis revealed two distinct cell subgroups, Malignant Cluster01 tumor cells, and Tip-like endothelial cells, showing significant interaction and closely associated with colorectal cancer prognosis. Specifically, Malignant Cluster01 subpopulations primarily served as signal senders, while Tip-like endothelial cells acted as receivers in PARs signaling. The Malignant Cluster01 and Tip-like endothelial cells related machine learning-derived prognostic signature (MTMLDPS), demonstrated potent prognostic capability, effectively predicting colorectal cancer patient outcomes across diverse databases. The colorectal cancer group with a high Malignant Cluster01 and Tip-like endothelial cells related machine learning-derived prognostic signature score exhibited significant associations with invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis pathways, along with immune cell infiltration. Conclusion: The Malignant Cluster01 and Tip-like endothelial cells related machine learning-derived prognostic signature holds promise for improving prognostic precision and guiding individual therapeutic strategies in colorectal cancer patients. Moreover, our findings emphasize the importance of considering tumor-endothelial cell interactions in cancer prognosis, providing insights for future therapeutic interventions targeting these interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.