ReviewTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2025
Adoptive Cell Therapy from the Dish: Potentiating Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Review in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging frontiers in adoptive cell therapies: engineering innovations, current challenges, and manufacturing perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Potential of CAR-Macrophages Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iMacs) for Solid Tumor Therapy.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Large scale quantification of natural killer cell-induced apoptosis in patient-derived organoids reveals intratumoral response heterogeneity.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Advances in Nanobody-Based Platforms for Precision Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Engineering the next generation of allogeneic CAR cells: iPSCs as a scalable and editable platform.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The clinical success of autologous adoptive cell therapy (ACT) is substantial but wide application is challenged by the quality and quantity of the patient's immune cells and the need for personalized manufacturing processes. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be differentiated into immune effectors and thus provide an alternative, allogeneic cell source for ACT. Here, we compare iPSC-derived immune effectors to their PBMC-derived counterparts and review iPSC-derived ACT products currently under preclinical and clinical development. Summary: iPSC-derived T cells, NK cells, macrophages, and neutrophils largely mimic their PBMC-derived counterparts in terms of cell-surface marker expression and cytotoxic effector functions. iPSC-derived immune effectors can be engineered with chimeric antigen receptors and other activating receptors to redirect their cytotoxic potential specifically to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). However, several differences between iPSC- and PBMC-derived immune effectors remain and have inspired additional engineering strategies to enhance the antitumor capacity of iPSC-derived immune effectors. Key Messages: iPSCs can be engineered to facilitate the generation of immune effectors with homogenous specificity for TAAs and enhanced effector functions. TAA-specific and functionally enhanced iPSC-derived T and NK cells are currently undergoing clinical evaluation in phase 1 trials. Engineered iPSC-derived macrophages and neutrophils are in preclinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.