ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Chemopreventive strategies for sporadic colorectal cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multifunctional 5-fluorouracil prodrug: synthesis, biological evaluation, and antitumor mechanism investigation.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Interrogating the Mechanistic Link between Neighborhood Deprivation and Colorectal Cancer Risk through Transcriptomic Analysis of Normal Colorectal Biopsies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: Drivers of Tumorigenesis and Therapeutic Opportunities.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer. CRC is known to arise from precancerous polyps known as adenomas. Although there are genetic syndromes (i.e., familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome) that carry a high lifetime risk of CRC, the majority of CRC cases are sporadic. Sporadic CRC develops via molecular events that occur early and frequently in the transformation of the normal colon epithelium to invasive cancer. Prevention of sporadic CRC (i.e., CRC chemoprevention) has been a topic of interest in the past decades due to its large public health burden. The objective of this study is to review various chemopreventive agents studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate their effectiveness and safety in preventing sporadic CRC. Methods: This review focuses on recent RCTs using potential chemopreventive agents to prevent sporadic CRC formation, either directly or through reduction of its known precursors such as adenomas or aberrant crypt foci (ACF) through interventions including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), vitamins and minerals, and metabolic agents. Key Content and Findings: Multiple RCTs have been conducted in sporadic CRC chemoprevention. NSAIDs have proven promising in sporadic CRC chemoprevention but have been limited due to increased cardiovascular risk, particularly for celecoxib and rofecoxib. Conclusions: There is active investigation into establishing the first sporadic CRC chemoprevention strategy. Building from previous trials, the choice of study population, selection of endpoints, safety and tolerability, availability of surrogate biomarkers, and novel mechanisms of action targeting the adenoma-carcinoma sequence remain important points to consider for all future trials of sporadic CRC chemoprevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.