ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2025
The role of neurotrophic factors in retinal ganglion cell resiliency.
Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Growth Hormone (GH) and Other Somatotropic Axis Elements in Retinal Neuroprotection.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Novel insights into β3-adrenoceptor function in a model of retinopathy of prematurity: the contribution of astrocytes to retinal protection.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Application of neurodegenerative disease treatment strategies in tinnitus: mechanisms, translation, and prospects.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Multifunctional nanoplatforms for optic nerve regeneration integrating anti-inflammatory, epigenetic, and ionic mechanisms with emerging artificial intelligence technologies.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Review
- Crosstalk Between Neuronal and Glial Cells in Diabetic Retinopathy: Mechanisms and Implications for Neurodegeneration.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Technological advances in the diagnosis and management of inherited optic neuropathies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Growth hormone reduces retinal inflammation and preserves microglial morphology after optic nerve crush in male rats.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many retinal diseases are characterized by direct or indirect retinal ganglion cell (RGC) neurodegeneration. In glaucoma and optic nerve neuropathies, RGCs are the primary affected cells, whereas in photoreceptor dystrophies, RGC loss is secondary to the death of rods and cones. The death of RGCs in either case will irreversibly cause loss of vision, as RGCs are the sole output neurons of the retina. RGC neurodegeneration affects certain neurons preferentially, resulting in subpopulations of resilient and susceptible cells. Neurotrophins (NTs) are known to mediate neuronal survival through the downstream activation of various anti-apoptotic pathways. In this review, we summarize the current methods of RGC identification and quantification in animal models of direct or indirect neurodegeneration, and describe the advantages and disadvantages associated with these techniques. Using these techniques, multiple studies have uncovered the potential role of NTs in protecting RGCs during direct neurodegeneration, with BDNF and NGF delivery promoting RGC survival in models of experimental glaucoma. Many fewer studies have addressed similar questions in retinal diseases where RGC loss is secondary to photoreceptor degeneration, yielding conflicting results. Our analysis suggests that these seemingly contradictory results can be explained by the varying onset and geographic distribution of photoreceptor death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.