Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944778›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Modeling dose uncertainty in cone-beam computed tomography: Predictive approach for deep learning-based synthetic computed tomography generation.

Cédric Hémon, Lucía Cubero, Valentin Boussot, Romane-Alize Martin, Blanche Texier, Joël Castelli, Renaud de Crevoisier, Anaïs Barateau, Caroline Lafond, Jean-Claude Nunes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cédric HémonUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Lucía CuberoUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Valentin BoussotUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Romane-Alize MartinUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Blanche TexierUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Joël CastelliUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Renaud de CrevoisierUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Anaïs BarateauUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Caroline LafondUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Jean-Claude NunesUniv. Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is essential in image-guided radiotherapy (RT) for patient positioning and daily dose calculation. However, CT numbers in CBCT fluctuate and differ from those in computed tomography (CT), requiring synthetic CT (sCT) generation to improve dose calculation accuracy. CBCT-to-sCT synthesis remains a challenging and uncertain task in clinical practice. This study aims to introduce a voxel-wise uncertainty estimator correlated with the error between sCT and CT. Material and Methods: Eighty-five head and neck (H&N) patients treated with photon RT from a single center were selected for developing and validating our uncertainty estimation method. To test the method's robustness on out-of-distribution images, three additional patients from different centers were included. Our proposed uncertainty estimation method builds on established conventional techniques. Additionally, to explore potential error scenarios, we generated several 'plausible' sCTs representing variations in sCT generation caused by CBCT quality differences. This allowed us to quantify dose uncertainties. Results: The effectiveness of uncertainty maps was evaluated by correlating them with the absolute error map between sCT and CT, yielding a Pearson correlation coefficient between 0.65 and 0.72. Dose uncertainty was determined on the dose-volume histogram (DVH). For all patients except one, the reference CT DVH was included in the uncertainty interval defined by the sCT-derived DVH. Conclusions: Our proposed methods effectively predict uncertainty maps that aid in evaluating sCT quality. This approach also provides a novel method for estimating dose uncertainty by defining a confidence interval around the CT DVH using the estimated sCT uncertainty.

Indexed as

CBCT-to-CT generationDose uncertaintyHead and NeckUncertainty estimation

Identifiers

PMID39944778
PMCPMC11815694

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.