ArticleClinical hypertension2025
Transition from parenteral treprostinil to selexipag aiming at hemodynamic targets in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Article in Clinical hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical research on pulmonary hypertension from a 2025 perspective: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Transitioning From Parenteral Prostanoids to Oral Selexipag in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the progress of treatment with intensive targeted therapy in high-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients and focused on setting an appropriate hemodynamic target of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≤4 Wood units (WU) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≤ 40 mmHg. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated high-risk PAH patients who were administered treprostinil at a single tertiary pulmonary hypertension center between January 2020 and December 2022. Echocardiography, right heart catheterization, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and blood tests were obtained 6 and 12 months after the initiation of parenteral treprostinil administration. Results: Twelve patients (1 male and 11 female; median age, 47.0 years [interquartile range, 33.8-49.8 years]) were included. Five of the 12 patients had 6- and 12-month follow-up data. The median PVR decreased by 22.9% at 6 months and 50.6% at 12 months compared to baseline. The median mPAP decreased by 24.6% at 6 months and 29.8% at 12 months. Importantly, the 6MWD showed a significant improvement of 55.7%, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels demonstrated a notable decrease of 16.0%, reflecting substantial enhancements in patients' functional status and heart health. Three of these 5 patients reached the hemodynamic target by 12 months and successfully transitioned from parenteral treprostinil to oral selexipag. Conclusions: This study showed that 3 of 5 patients (60.0%) with high-risk PAH reached PVR ≤ 4 WU and/or mPAP ≤ 40 mmHg by receiving intensive parenteral treprostinil therapy with significant improvements in 6MWD and NT-proBNP levels, and successfully transitioned to oral selexipag. We proposed that transition strategies from parenteral treprostinil to selexipag aiming at hemodynamic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.