ReviewEchocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)2025
Value of Ultrahigh-Resolution Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography in Cardiac Imaging.
Review in Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Photon-counting CT versus energy-integrating detectors for cardiac imaging: a systematic review of evidence from in vivo human studies on image quality and radiation dose.BMC medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Photon-Counting CT Angiography in Vascular Stenosis Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Angiographic Assessment of Simple Cardiac Shunts in Adults.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Spectral Imaging Techniques in Heart Disease Assessment Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It was only fitting that when computed tomography (CT) was celebrating its 50th birthday since its maiden scan in 1971, it was also entering into a new generation in 2021 with the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the first photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. As non-invasive cardiac imaging is evolving into an ever more important medical field, the introduction of this new technology promises a slew of improvements over energy-integrating detector (EID)-CTs, most importantly improved spatial resolution in the form of ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) imaging, reduced radiation exposure, and routinely acquired spectral information. Spatial resolution has historically been a key hurdle for cardiac CT, especially for coronary imaging where structures in the realm of 2 mm need to be assessed. Initial reports on the use of PCD-CT in cardiac imaging so far have been promising, but many questions ranging from standardized scan protocols to evidence-based recommendations remain. The aim of this review is to discuss the currently available literature regarding the use of UHR PCD-CT for cardiac imaging and explore if it has led to changes in guidelines or patient workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.