Trial reportCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Analysis of C4 Concentrations to Predict Impact of Patient-Reported Diarrhea Associated With the Ileal Bile Acid Transporter Inhibitor Linerixibat.
Trial report in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02966834 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-dose, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of GSK2330672 Administration for the Treatment of Pruritus in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-dose, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of GSK2330672 Administration for the Treatment of Pruritus in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (GLIMMER: GSK2330672 triaL of IBAT Inhibition With Multidose Measurement for Evaluation of Response)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benefits and challenges to therapeutic targeting of bile acid circulation in cholestatic liver disease.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linerixibat, an ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitor, is being evaluated for the treatment of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Diarrhea is commonly reported with this drug class as IBAT inhibition redirects bile acids (BA) to the colon. Serum 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) measurement is a validated method to identify BA diarrhea. To inform dose selection, we characterized the relationship between linerixibat dose, C4 levels, and patient-reported bother on the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) diarrhea question. A kinetic-pharmacodynamic model was developed using data from five Phase 1/2 trials, to describe the effect of linerixibat dose (1-180 mg) and regimen (once/twice daily) on C4 concentrations over time. GSRS data from patients with PBC and pruritus in the Phase 2b GLIMMER study (NCT02966834) were used to develop a proportional odds model to predict the probability of a score of 1-7 (no-very severe discomfort) to the question "Have you been bothered by diarrhea during the past week?" in relation to linerixibat dose. The two models were linked to describe the linerixibat dose-C4-diarrhea bother relationship. Models were validated using graphical and numerical assessment and visual predictive checks. Linerixibat caused dose-dependent increases in C4 until saturation (~180 mg total daily dose). Increased C4 concentrations trended with increased GSRS diarrhea scores. Simulations demonstrated increases in moderate-to-very severe (≥ 4) diarrhea scores with increasing linerixibat dose. Increases in patient-reported diarrhea scores were linerixibat dose-dependent. Selecting an optimal dose that maximizes linerixibat's ability to improve pruritus while minimizing patient-reported diarrhea bother is important to support treatment adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.