ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2025
Clinical manifestations and pathogenicity of Clade IIb monkeypox virus in rabbits.
Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative pathogenicity study of monkeypox virus Clade Ib and Clade IIb in a rabbit model.Virulence · 2026Article
- Mpox animal models: a comprehensive evaluation of susceptible species for pathogenesis studies and drug discovery.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Review
- Pathogenicity and transmissibility of Mpox virus in African dormice.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Host Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Response to Mpox Virus Infection.Viruses · 2025Article
- Transmissibility of Clade IIb Monkeypox Virus in Young Rabbits.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Monkeypox Virus Subverts the Inflammatory Response of Macrophages at the Maternal-Fetal Interface.Journal of medical virology · 2025Article
- Current status of next-generation vaccines against mpox virus: a scoping review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 2022 monkeypox outbreak involved rapid global dissemination, prompting research into animal models for the monkeypox virus (MPXV), including non-human primates and mice. However, studies utilizing rabbits as models remain limited. In this study, we established three rabbit models using the current epidemic MPXV strain. Following intravenous MPXV injection, adult rabbits exhibited characteristic clinical manifestations, including widespread rash and fever, with viral replication in the skin, lungs, and testes, resulting in severe pathological damage by 6 days post-infection (dpi). Intradermal injection of MPXV into the dorsal skin of adult rabbits produced red lesions with central necrosis and hemorrhage accompanied by dense inflammatory infiltrates. Abundant viral particles were observed in epidermal cells at 6 dpi. Additionally, a fatal MPXV model was developed in 10-day-old rabbits using intranasal virus administration. These young rabbits exhibited lethargy and diarrhea beginning at 2 dpi, significant weight loss, and a 50% mortality rate by 15 dpi. Viral dissemination was detected in multiple organs, leading to extensive multi-organ damage. This study highlights the utility of rabbit models for MPXV, displaying typical clinical features and pathogenic mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.