ReviewAnnals of hematology2025
Overview of 1q abnormalities in multiple myeloma: scientific opinions from Italian experts.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Impact of Chromosome 1q Gain/Amplification in Multiple Myeloma Treated With Daratumumab-Based Regimens.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematological malignancy characterised by high genomic heterogeneity. One of the most common cytogenic abnormalities in MM is the gain of genetic material at the long arm (q) of chromosome 1 (+ 1q). While many mechanisms of resistance have been associated with + 1q alterations (e.g. CD38 downregulation, impairment of complement-dependent cytotoxicity, or induction of immunosuppression), the precise genetic or pathogenetic factors responsible for these alterations are still being investigated. Although interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation (iFISH) is the gold standard for the detection of + 1q abnormalities used by the majority of diagnostic laboratories worldwide, there are no universally recognised cut-offs for + 1q positivity or a threshold for clinical meaningfulness. Because iFISH alone is insufficient to elucidate the extent of + 1q and other cytogenetic abnormalities in MM, sequencing-based methods could be adopted. The second revision of the international staging system for MM recently recognised + 1q as a high-risk feature. There is increasing evidence that + 1q has a prognostic value and influences the duration of remission, suggesting that patients with MM and + 1q may benefit from tailored therapy. This review comprehensively summarises the most recent biological evidence and clinical data on + 1q abnormalities in MM. However, given the heterogeneous data available, it remains difficult to draw firm conclusions. In clinical practice, +1q alterations should be evaluated along with other cytogenetic abnormalities and other biological and clinical characteristics of the disease. Ongoing and future studies will help the full understanding of the role of + 1q in MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.