Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39946029›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025

Attitudes of Peer Support Workers towards the Medical Model: A Qualitative Study from the Viewpoints of Peer Support Workers and Mental Health Staff.

Guillermo Ruiz-Pérez, Sebastian von Peter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guillermo Ruiz-PérezDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany. Guillermo.perez@mhb-fontane.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3753-0796
Sebastian von PeterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.

Funding

Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss 01VSF19042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attitudes of Peer Support Workers are generally expected to be grounded in recovery philosophy. They may encounter resistance from Mental Health Workers, which tend to be more closely aligned with the medical model. We aim to investigate how PSWs relate in clinical contexts to some main aspects of medical model-based attitudes. This research is part of the larger ImpPeer-Psy5 project, involving 57 interviews with PSWs, MHWs, and service users. The findings presented here were derived from a qualitative sub-study with 5 more interviews and one focus group with MHWs. Some PSWs view psychiatric diagnoses as helpful for their own recovery and interactions with clients, while others find them reductive and stigmatizing. Similarly, PSWs hold varying opinions on psychiatric drugs, with some seeing them as beneficial and necessary, while others have critical views. MHWs' expectations on PSWs may not always align with their attitudes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPeer GroupAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial SupportAttitudeImplementationMedical modelPeer support workRecovery

Identifiers

PMID39946029
PMCPMC12228647

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.