ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025
Machine-learning approaches to predict individualized treatment effect using a randomized controlled trial.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation versus acupressure on the trajectories of multidimensional adverse reactions to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Trial
- Digital positive affect intervention (PAI) versus self-monitoring placebo in the treatment of anxiety and depression: a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT).BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Estimating and discovering heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning in epidemiological studies: a practical guide.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Review
- Computational Nutrition in Practice: Challenges and Opportunities From an Early-Career Perspective.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Machine learning-guided composite ionic liquid-based system for dual-drug delivery targeting redox homeostasis and STAT3-PI3K axis in psoriasis therapy.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Uncovering the Role of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Cognitive Impairment Progression.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2025Article
- Individualized Triplet Chemotherapy Decision-Making in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Machine-Learning-Driven Study.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in machine learning (ML) for analyzing heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) are gaining prominence within the medical and epidemiological communities, offering potential breakthroughs in the realm of precision medicine by enabling the prediction of individual responses to treatments. This paper introduces the methodological frameworks used to study HTEs, particularly based on a single randomized controlled trial (RCT). We focus on methods to estimate conditional average treatment effect (CATE) for multiple covariates, aiming to predict individualized treatment effects. We explore a range of methodologies from basic frameworks like the T-learner, S-learner, and Causal Forest, to more advanced ones such as the DR-learner and R-learner, as well as cross-validation for CATE estimation to enhance statistical efficiency by estimating CATE for all RCT participants. We also provide a practical application of these approaches using the Preventing Overweight Using Novel Dietary Strategies (POUNDS Lost) trial, which compared the effects of high versus low-fat diet interventions on 2-year weight changes. We compared different sets of covariates for CATE estimation, showing that the DR- and R-learners are useful for the estimation of CATE in high-dimensional settings. This paper aims to explain the theoretical underpinnings and methodological nuances of ML-based HTE analysis without relying on technical jargon, making these concepts more accessible to the clinical and epidemiological research communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.