ArticleReproduction (Cambridge, England)2025
A lack of commensal microbiota influences the male reproductive tract intergenerationally in mice.
Article in Reproduction (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epididymal extracellular vesicles harbor and convey mRNA to sperm for transfer to zygotes.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- The microbiota extends the reproductive lifespan of mice by safeguarding the ovarian reserve.Cell host & microbe · 2025Article
- From gut to gamete: how the microbiome influences fertility and preconception health.Microbiome · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In brief: Germ-free mice display epididymal transcriptomic changes that were also evident in their conventionalized male offspring and mice lacking T and B cells. This paper demonstrates the role of microbiota and immune cells in the epididymis. Abstract: The microbiome encompasses the array of microorganisms inhabiting various niches in the body and is necessary for numerous physiological processes, including normal metabolism and a functioning immune system. Not only does the absence of a microbiome in mice impact the exposed animals but also inherited phenotypes in successive generations of progeny, suggesting that the absence of a microbiome impacts the germline and gametes. Indeed, recent research has identified a role of the gut microbiome in contributing to male fertility, in both healthy and disease states. While this link is beginning to be established, the impact of the microbiome on the male reproductive tract remains understudied. Here, we utilized a germ-free mouse model to examine the influence of the absence of microbes on the male reproductive tract. In contrast to mice with an established microbiome, germ-free mice display decreased testicular weight and the prevalence of an epididymitis-like inflammation phenotype. These histopathological changes are accompanied by transcriptomic dysregulation in the reproductive tract of germ-free mice, particularly in the cauda epididymis. Moreover, these transcriptomic changes are transmitted to the next generation with high correlation of gene expression in the cauda epididymis between germ-free mice and their conventionalized (microbiome-restored) male offspring, when compared to control mice. Ultimately, our findings identify the reproductive sequalae of males without a functional microbiome and additionally in their conventionalized offspring, suggesting that the paternal microbiota is an underappreciated contributor to male reproductive function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.