ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive pharmacokinetic profiling and molecular docking analysis of natural bioactive compounds targeting oncogenic biomarkers in breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel lipid and ascorbyl stearate biomimetic vancomycin-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier therapy for bacterial infections and sepsis.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Synthetic Elaboration, DFT Profiling, and Molecular-Dynamics-Guided Computational Validation Toward Anti-Diabetic Therapeutics: Tailored Pyrimidine-Derived Pyrazole-Thiadiazole Hybrid Scaffolds.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Molecular Insights into Phage-Hydrogel Polymer Interactions Through Docking, Molecular Dynamics, and Machine Learning.Polymers · 2026Article
- Integrative bioinformatics approach to the mRNA vaccine development for the human papillomavirus using the capsid protein.Biology direct · 2026Article
- PAMAM dendrimers as efficient drug nanocarriers of natural compounds in breast cancer therapeutics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Exploring the molecular basis ofBioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Attenuation of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion induced neurotoxicity by telmisartan, ertugliflozin, and omaveloxolone through Nrf2/HO-1 pathway modulation: In vivo and in silico insights.Toxicology reports · 2025Article
- Fabrication of α-lactalbumin-coated chamomile nano-emulsion for their synergistic anticancer and anti-inflammatory applications.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in women worldwide, highlighting the crucial need for novel and effective treatments. In this study, we look at the ability of four natural compounds i.e. Berberine, Curcumin, Withaferin A, and Ellagic Acid to target important breast cancer biomarkers such as B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL-1), cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR). These indicators have important roles in tumor development, survival, immune response, and cell cycle control, making them potential targets for future cancer treatments. Our study employs a variety of techniques, including pharmacokinetic profiling (ADME), molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations, to determine how successful these drugs could be in therapy. The pharmacokinetic investigation found that Berberine and Ellagic Acid stand out due to their high absorption and solubility, implying that they could be suitable for clinical application. When we ran docking simulations, we discovered substantial connections between these chemicals and the target proteins. Additionally, Berberine has a binding affinity of - 9.3 kcal/mol for BCL-2, indicating that it can impair the protein's cancer cell-protective activities. Ellagic Acid, on the other hand, has an even higher binding affinity for PDL-1 of - 9.8 kcal/mol, showing that it may be able to increase immune responses against tumors. Molecular dynamics simulations over 100 ns demonstrated the stability of these protein-ligand complexes. Interestingly, Ellagic Acid was found to be more structurally stable than Berberine throughout these simulations. We found consistent interactions between the chemicals and key residues in the target proteins. For example, Ellagic Acid (CID: 5281855) established persistent linkages with LYS43, ASP163, and VAL27, whereas Berberine (CID: 2353) interacted with VAL27, ALA41, and LEU152 throughout the simulation. In conclusion, the combination of good pharmacokinetics, robust interactions with cancer biomarkers, and stable complexes makes Berberine and Ellagic Acid interesting candidates for further investigation as natural inhibitors in breast cancer treatment. These findings establish the framework for future research into novel and inventive techniques to effectively combating breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.