ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the relevance of nucleotide metabolism in the prognosis of glioblastoma through bioinformatics models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- UPP1 in Cancer: Context-Dependent Roles in Metabolic Adaptation and Treatment Response.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- BioLM-NET: an interpretable deep learning model combining prior biological knowledge and contextual LLM gene embeddings on multi-omics data to predict disease.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2026Article
- Molecular characterization of macrophage-related prognostic factors in glioblastoma revealed by combined analysis on single-cell and bulk transcriptome data.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleotide metabolism (NM) is a fundamental process that enables the rapid growth of tumors. Glioblastoma (GBM) primarily relies on NM for its invasion, leading to severe clinical outcomes. This study focuses on NM to identify potential biomarkers associated with GBM. Publicly available databases were used as the primary data source for this study, excluding biological tissue samples. We identified and evaluated key genes involved in NM, followed by developing and validating a prognostic model. Patients were classified into high- and low-risk groups based on this model, and the two groups were compared with respect to cellular immunity and mutation profiles. The biomarkers were confirmed using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Our study identified UPP1, CDA, NUDT1, and ADSL as significant biomarkers associated with prognosis, all of which were upregulated in patients with GBM. The risk score and clinical factors such as age, sex, GBM stage, MGMT promoter status, and IDH mutation status were found to be independent prognostic factors. Patients with glioblastoma showed a higher overall mutation burden. Using bioinformatics, this study identifies key factors associated with NM in GBM that may influence patient prognosis. This study enhances our understanding of GBM, provides valuable insights for further research, and serves as a reference for evaluating patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.