ReviewNPJ precision oncology2025
Towards an interpretable deep learning model of cancer.
Review in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biologically informed neural network models are robust to spurious interactions via self-pruning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Zero-shot prediction of drug responses using biologically informed neural networks trained on phosphoproteomic timeseries.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Models for Cancer Research: A Narrative Review of Bulk RNA-Seq Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biologically informed neural network models are robust to spurious interactions via self-pruning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-driven multi-omics analysis: enhancing cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Pathway-guided architectures for interpretable AI in biological research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is a manifestation of dysfunctional cell states. It emerges from an interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that disrupt cellular dynamics, including genetic and epigenetic alterations, as well as the tumor microenvironment. This complexity can make it challenging to infer molecular causes for treating the disease. This may be addressed by system-wide computer models of cells, as they allow rapid generation and testing of hypotheses that would be too slow or impossible to perform in the laboratory and clinic. However, so far, such models have been impeded by both experimental and computational limitations. In this perspective, we argue that they can now be achieved using deep learning algorithms to integrate omics data and prior knowledge of molecular networks. Such models would have many applications in precision oncology, e.g., for identifying drug targets and biomarkers, predicting resistance mechanisms and toxicity effects of drugs, or simulating cell-cell interactions in the microenvironment.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.