Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948530›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Applications of digital health technologies and artificial intelligence algorithms in COPD: systematic review.

Zhenli Chen, Jie Hao, Haixia Sun, Min Li, Yuan Zhang, Qing Qian

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhenli Chen *Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jie Hao *Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Haixia SunInstitute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Min LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yuan ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qing QianInstitute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. qing_qian@hotmail.com.

Funding

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2021-I2M-1-057IMICAMS Youth Talent Development Fund 2024YT01National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC3601001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) represents a significant global health challenge, placing considerable burdens on healthcare systems. The rise of digital health technologies (DHTs) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms offers new opportunities to improve COPD predictive capabilities, diagnostic accuracy, and patient management. This systematic review explores the types of data in COPD under DHTs, the AI algorithms employed for data analysis, and identifies key application areas reported in the literature.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science for studies published up to December 2024 that applied AI algorithms in digital health for COPD management. Inclusion criteria focused on original research utilizing AI algorithms and digital health technologies for COPD, while review articles were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened the studies, resolving discrepancies through consensus.

resultsFrom an initial pool of 265 studies, 41 met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of these studies highlighted a diverse range of data types and modalities collected from DHTs in the COPD context, including clinical data, patient-reported outcomes, and environmental/lifestyle data. Machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed in 34 studies, and deep learning (DL) algorithms in 16. Support vector machines and boosting were the most frequently used ML models, while deep neural networks (DNN) and convolutional neural networks (CNN) were the most commonly used DL models. The review identified three key application domains for AI in COPD: screening and diagnosis (10 studies), exacerbation prediction (22 studies), and patient monitoring (9 studies). Disease progression prediction was a prevalent focus across three domains, with promising accuracy and performance metrics reported.

conclusionsDigital health technologies and AI algorithms have a wide range of applications and promise for COPD management. ML models, in particularly, show great potential in improving digital health solutions for COPD. Future research should focus on enhancing global collaboration to explore the cost-effectiveness and data-sharing capabilities of DHTs, enhancing the interpretability of AI models, and validating these algorithms through clinical trials to facilitate their safe integration into the routine COPD management.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBiomedical TechnologyPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTelemedicineDigital HealthHumansArtificial intelligenceChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseDeep learningDigital healthMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39948530
PMCPMC11823091

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.