ArticleBMC public health2025
Living and neighborhood environments and anxiety symptoms among older adults in Anhui, China: evidence from a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- AFLE-HIV: developing an age-friendly living environment assessment framework for elderly HIV-infected individuals in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Environmental noise and self-rated health in older surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia: a cross-sectional study of anxiety as a behavioral pathway for healthy aging.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to investigate the relationships between living and neighborhood environmental factors and anxiety symptoms among older adults residing in urban and rural areas of Anhui Province, China.
methodsData were collected from 5876 participants in a cross-sectional study carried out in four cities located in Anhui, China. Anxiety symptoms were evaluated via the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), and participants with scores of 5 and above were defined as having anxiety symptoms. The presence of dust and noise in the context of daily life was used to evaluate the living environment of the participants. The neighborhood environment was assessed by the availability of barrier-free facilities, proximity to facilities (supermarkets, restaurants, hospitals, and parks), and green and blue space near participants' dwellings. Multilevel linear and logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the associations between these environmental factors and anxiety symptoms.
resultsThe participants who lived in dusty environments had elevated GAD-7 scores and higher odds of anxiety (dust: β = 0.754, 95% CI: 0.337, 1.171; OR = 1.451, 95% CI: 1.164, 1.809). Having barrier-free facilities and the existence of a neighboring park decreased the GAD-7 scores and the likelihood of having anxiety symptoms (barrier-free facilities: β=-0.503, 95% CI: -0.992, -0.085; OR = 0.768, 95% CI: 0.656, 0.899; park: β=-0.478, 95% CI: -0.830, -0.125; OR = 0.599, 95% CI: 0.440, 0.816). However, participants residing in close proximity to the hospital presented an increased likelihood of experiencing anxiety symptoms (OR = 1.377, 95% CI: 1.162, 1.631).
conclusionsParticipants who lived in dusty and noisy environments were more likely to suffer from anxiety, whereas those who lived near barrier-free facilities and parks were at lower risk. The findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to create age-friendly communities, suggesting an integrated approach that combines environmental health strategies with mental health strategies for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.